#IndianStartupData : Grofers Revenue Stands At Rs. 86 lacs At A Loss Of Rs. 4 Crores in FY14-15

Editor Notes : Nothing is as powerful as data and these articles are part of our coverage of #IndianStartupData – i.e. an overview of financial performance of selected Indian startups with a hope that it gives you a good picture of the companies and the ecosystem in general.
Our Mission : A PR-less startup ecosystem which thrives on great products and services!]

Grofers has reported its annual returns with the Registrar of Companies for the financial year 2014-15. The company reported a revenue of INR 86 lacs at a loss of INR 3.9 crores in the year.indianstartupdata

Financial Performance of Grofers

The company reported a revenue of INR 86 lacs in FY14-15 compared to INR 1.8 lacs in FY13-14. Out of INR 86 lacs, INR 73 lacs was revenue from operations. The company realizes its revenue from the commission on sale of products and reimbursement of freight and collection expenses from the vendors.

The company made a loss of INR 3.9 crores in FY14-15 compared to a loss of INR 2.8 lacs the previous fiscal. Largest expense head was ‘Employee Expenses’ at INR 2.2 crores, followed by ‘Manpower Supply charges’ at INR 61 lacs and ‘Advertising Promotional Expense at INR 60 lacs’.


According to Grofers’ website, their mobile app has 1.6 million downloads and it took only 10 days for Grofers to spread across 17 cities in the country. Evidently, the company has been on a major expansion spree in the past few months.[pullquote float=’RIGHT’ color=’#FFF’ bgcolor=’#000′]Largest expense head was ‘Employee Expenses’ at INR 2.2 crores, followed by ‘Manpower Supply charges’[/pullquote]

This has been fueled by 3 rounds of funding received from Sequoia and Tiger Global. As per the documents filed with the Registrar of Companies, it had raised INR 305 crores (~$50 million) till August this year. It was widely reported in the news that Grofers had raised another $120 million in November 2015, from a group of investors led by Softbank, but they have not filed any documents for the same.

» Note that Grofers is currently fighting a lawsuit over the brand name.

Recently, major e-commerce players have jumped in to get a share of the hyper-local pie as well. Flipkart Nearby and Amazon Kirana are operational in Bangalore and are offering groceries at customer’s doorsteps. Ola also launched their Ola Store to provide instant delivery of groceries. Hyperlocal seems to be the buzzword and early entrants (and heavily funded) players like Grofers seem to be at the forefront in this space.

As the segment matures and looks to consolidate, few big acquisitions may be on the cards. For now, they have made lives easier for a large number of people.

About Grofers

Grofers was founded in 2013 by Saurabh Kumar and Albinder Dhindsa. It offers a wide range of products for instant delivery through its mobile app. According to Grofers’ website, it offers more than 1,20,000 products across various categories including fresh produce, grocery, bakery, cosmetics, household and recently electronic goods as well. The app provides the users the choice to order goods from nearby local stores and get those delivered within 90 minutes of placing the order. It is present across 26 cities in India.

Grofers is in its third year of operations. The company had initially started as a B2B service and later switched to the hyperlocal B2C model. It had launched its mobile app last year in December for customers use.

[About the author: Vishal and Anchal form the team that runs the Tofler blog. They like to explore and track companies, their performance and senior management. Tofler (tofler.in) is a Business Research Platform.]


Leave a Reply
  1. Are there any reliable estimates available for the GMV? Assuming the revenues mentioned in this article refer to revenue from commission, and not GMV.

  2. This revenue is from commission and is not GMV. It is mentioned in the article – “The company realizes its revenue from the commission on sale of products..”

  3. Grofers has been operational only for two years, hence, guess what – numbers only for two years! Please understand that an analysis is only as good as the data available. GMV cannot be analyzed or discussed if it is not disclosed. However, what can be discussed is what is available which is – revenue and breakup of expenses. Non-availability of more data should not prevent us from looking at what is available.
    Benchmarking, for sure, is on cards once the data becomes available for some of the key players, until then, this is what we have to offer 🙂

  4. The article starts off saying , nothing is as powerful as data and then goes on to mention last two years revenue and lexoebse in two lines.. Why do you need a graph for that? Rest of the article is recycle old news., no analysis on GMV , no of orders, folders or competitor no benchmarking.. What lazy ass journalism is this!

Leave a Reply