Hyper local has been a buzz word in Indian Internet startups for more than a year now. We had first “Local” and a lot of companies attempted cracking it, but all came out of it with a broken limb or two except for JustDial. Even before we could crack the “Local” industry “Hyper-Local” made an entry. Now one of the biggest pain point with cracking the “Local” (local search etc..) has been the lack of foot-on-streets strategy. Does that apply to Hyper-Local as well? Do you play it head-on or you try to circumvent it innovatively?” [asked here by Mayank].
[The answer comes from VV Preetham, founder of Quantama, a LBS service app.]
If I take the question at face value, then it is at a very high level. It is almost like asking “What is the best means of transport on land (in India)?” The devil is actually in the details of what we perceive of this question. What do you mean by “best” (quality, cost, value, speed)? What do you mean by “transport” (for people, live stock, fragile goods, general goods)? What will be the volume, frequency of travel? Will it be in a desert? Metaled Road? By-lanes? Across highways? Rough off-road terrain? (Point being made)
Similarly, In this question we have the following variables ‘best’, ‘strategy’, ‘hyperlocal’ and ‘India’ which has wide ranging and extremely swinging perceptions. Best for who? (vendor, manufacturer, service provider, consumer…)? What is a threshold to say something is strategic versus operational (from a near term cash-flow perspective? or a long term organic growth perspective?) What is hyperlocal? Which India? (The 4 broad demographics in a tier-1 city? The multitude of BoP class which can only be classified on economics, but gets hairy when we apply cultural context? Aspirants from tier-2, tier-3?…)
Let’s specifically say for hyperlocal, the challenge with any discussion around hyperlocal quickly surmounts to what each of us perceive as hyperlocal (and also based on what categories already has or has-not worked in some distant markets). Some agree that it is around a physical boundary (narrow geography) while others vehemently deny a concept of geography involved at all (the theory of nearness to an idea/concept which does not encompass geography is also accepted as hyperlocal).
As an example, let me assume that the flavor of discussion I would like to ‘barely attempt’ to provide my opinion, contains the following key constituents: Narrow-geography based on your immediate current location, Relevance, Individual targeting, Retail and Tier-1 city as a domain (even this is at a very high level).
Then IMO, (at a very aggregate level) India and BRIC style developing nations will be the most equitable places where hyperlocal will thrive in the mid to long term forecasts.
Why? because the heterogeneity of the markets and the amount of fragmentation and decentralization in these nations are high (intuitively, that is, compared to homogeneous, big-box EDLP markets). As a hygiene-argument from a market-category perspective, demand analysis in such markets is way costlier if it has to be done by each SMB on their own. Currently even large well funded (offline retail) conglomerates in India suffer majorly from demand metrics which can significantly improve top-lines when applied well. (This assuming hyperlocal enables significant improvements on demand-chain solutions, which it resoundingly does)
A large part of Indian-metro population is cost conscious markets (specifically around dailies, staples, consumer durables and household services) as I understand it (Note that not all FMCG falls in this group or beauty and restaurant services is avoided intentionally as that has its own segmented behavior). (Again, what is good for Mrs Khanna is not good for Mr. Iyer).
If you look at the market from the (stated) consumer perspective for the specifically stated categories, then IMO, we can ascertain that finding value (cause one is cost conscious) for what we pay in such heterogeneous markets is extremely painful. and hence, where there is pain (latent or otherwise) there ought to be innovative solutions which shall be reasonably profitable for all players involved.
There are many execution specific questions that pops-up when you generalize such arguments.
What is the pain threshold? Will the consumer generally live with the pain in a latent mode until a hyperlocal-solution is offered? or have they already moved on with other alternatives with maximum utility (group-deals are already hyperlocal)? What is the segment size and the number of segments that can be herded with a single platform enabling dynamic customization for similar market segments at minimal cost for the solution-provider? Can it go to the level of relevance and individual targeting over a period of time? Can you apply consumer language for all of the questions and simplify the ‘value find’ use-cases efficiently in near-term?
The nature of solution in itself is a huge debate. Add to that the number of edge-devices, maturity of the masses to soak up mobility solutions (or other such profile), technology, market-led innovations etc.. and we can keep this debate on for a long time in vaccum. Justifying an opinion to such interesting debates on a single-post on a blog is really hard without getting excited on every aspect of the problem-space. (Maybe further blogs)
Meanwhile, think through the following hyperlocal use-cases and apply your own perspectives:
- Collective collaboration at the community marketplace where vendors offer service-packs (electricians, painters, plumbers…)
- Community economics encouraging sustainable & experiential lifestyle involving gaming, community sharing (used items, car pool)
- Social engagements involving flash mobs, activism, common goal (as against common interest), social donors.
- Enhancing supply-side (sourcing) dynamics with stock and asset moments along with logistics, in-bounding, relevant auto-indents.
- Empowering producers (farmers) at the geo-fenced level with info enablers such as price flux, input source, weather, infra
- Enabling ‘catchment level’ sales structures and program support elements empowering feet-on-street, reducing fiction costs.
- Community news, for the community, by the community enabling personalized channels and preferences.
- Transport details involving nearness, cost, mode, quality of experience (crowded) and alternatives.
- Near-store engagements enabling experience that are relevant for the moment-of-maximum exposure limiting the lead times to zero.
In essence #hyperlocal is an ability to focus on a market of 1 (or few) engaging with relevant info based on personalization in real-time, near-to where you are currently located. There are no experts who can predict the outcome of any of the myriad hyperlocal use-cases for India or anywhere globally. We should only be cautious not to throw baby out along with the bath-water.
What’s your take?