- Senior Advocate Arvind Datar challenged the proposed amendment’s constitutionality, arguing it arbitrarily restrains online free speech.
- His argument centered on the amendment’s failure to satisfy the ‘proportionality test’ utilized by the Supreme Court for assessing infringements on fundamental rights.
- The government has deferred the law’s implementation until July 28th while the Bombay High Court hears the legal challenge on this law.
Menu
