Piracy – Is it really that bad? I don’t think soNovember 29, 2006 2006-11-29 11:03
Piracy – Is it really that bad? I don’t think so
Piracy – Is it really that bad? I don’t think so
Let me explain my point of view with the following examples.
1. Software Piracy :: Microsoft Windows and Adobe Photoshop
“For every $2 worth of software purchased legally, $1 worth of software is pirated illegally.”
Microsoft’s Windows and Adobe’s Photoshop are probably the most pirated softwares of the world.
Its true that both of these companies lose a huge amount of revenues to piracy. But wait! There is more to piracy than short-term revenue – i.e. locked-in customers.
During my stint@Engg college, I used to work on UNIX terminals (SCO-UNIX, PINE email client etc.). And then Windows 95 arrived. And it changed the way I used computers.
Thanks to piracy, I was able to get a copy of Windows 95/98 for almost free. And the result? Gates are closed for any other operating system in my life.
Now, having grown up with Windows, the very thought of those dumb unix terminals suck. And am not even willing to move to Mac.
Infact, isn’t piracy one of the biggest reason for Microsoft to be hugely popular? (Go around any local neighbor/shop – they all run softwares on Windows. And you think it’s the original copy? Dream on).
Tim O’Reilly, whose company publishes a highly successful line of technical computing titles, goes on to say the illegal software downloads are actually a tool to market one’s products. And many a times it’s a ‘Trial-before-Buying’ phenomena.
Same with Photoshop – Ask any graphics designer and I can bet my ass off that his/her first intro to photo editing would have been a pirated version of Photoshop. But once that guy is hooked onto the product, chances are that he/she will promote the product in their network and of course the workplace.
Otherwise why would SPSS (a statistical tool) give away its software to MBA grads for free? – It’s a simple logic: Catch them young (i.e. give them the free-legitimate version before they get the pirated one!)
2. Books: Roam around streets of Bangalore/Delhi and you will notice tonnes of new & pirated books sold at 10% of the original cost!
Tim O’Reilly argues that book piracy ultimately helps in improving sales (if not in present, but for sure in future):
- Obscurity is a far greater threat to authors and creative artists than piracy: – More than 100,000 books are published each year, with several million books in print, yet fewer than 10,000 of those new books have any significant sales, and only a hundred thousand or so of all the books in print are carried in even the largest stores.
- Piracy is progressive taxation:..which may shave a few percentage points off the sales of well-known artists (and I say “may” because even that point is not proven), in exchange for massive benefits to the far greater number for whom exposure may lead to increased revenues.
- Customers want to do the right thing, if they can: And the simplest way to get customers to stop trading illicit digital copies of music and movies is to give those customers a legitimate alternative, at a fair price. [If people don’t want to do the right thing, what the hell is social networking all about?]
3. Music Piracy – Yeah, we all have heard of demise of Napster as well as the litigations sorrounding the mp3/p2p sharing sites. But who downloads these mp3s?
People like you and me; who don’t really see a value in buying the premium priced CDs/albums (few good songs;while others are just fillers).
And how do we give back to the music industry? Huge amount of money that you and I spend on buying CDs/Live show tickets/Movies – they all outweigh the cost of piracy.
And why is music piracy important?
- Discovery of Artists/Songs – Thanks to mp3 piracy, I do get to discover artists I wouldn’t have heard otherwise.
- Many a times I look for songs that are no more available in the market, they are too difficult to find [e.g. ‘Ek hi khwaab’ from Kinara, Bon Jovi’s rendition of ‘Stairway to Heaven’ and many more]. And P2P is the way to go. This is music that is difficult to find — except online — but, once found, leads to a focused search for CDs, records, and other artifacts, as O’Reilly mentions.
Finally, who loses the most from piracy?
Most significantly, the publishers who refuse to accept the inevitable (that piracy is bound to happen).
And secondly, the competitors!!
And how does piracy kills competition?
- If you have a pirated copy of Photoshop [fully-functional;with bells and whistles), will you use the other lowly priced alternative (or even open source product like Gimp, which is as good as Photoshop)?
- If you have access to Microsoft’s pirated copy of Windows/Office, will you be interested in Linux/Star office?
Case in point, Mac lost to Windows – because of Window’s reach among masses (which was
mainly achieved on the vehicles of piracy) and not whether MS had a better technology/marketing over Apple.
To cut the long story short – I am not promoting piracy, but the point that I am trying to make is that piracy doesn’t hurt so much.
First of all, let’s agree that a software/music/book is not pirated until there is a huge demand-supply gap. If there is a huge demand, then any bottleneck in supply is attributed to company’s strategy (pricing/distribution channel).
Companies should understand the basic reason why products are pirated?
Cost vs. Value Gap. – If the cost of a product is way too high vis-a-vis it’s perceived value, the general tendency will be to bring down the cost.
For e.g. if a premiumly priced music album has just 3 good songs while other 10 are plain mediocre, I don’t see any reason why one should pay a premium price for the album. In such cases, piracy is bound to happen.
– so either you match value with the price or bring down the price. Or sell individual songs? Or launch the album under ‘Creative Commons‘ license?
Infact, few smart publishers have formulated innovative means to fight piracy. They are pushing the online version of the book on the internet, and generate free publicity — which results in actual sales. A phenomena which is termed ‘Buying the Cow, Though the milk is Free’.
Why can’t others do the same?
Let the ‘Creative Commons’ sense prevail. What do you think?
Filed under: piracy