PERMA™ Theory of Well-Being and PERMA™ Workshops

PERMA™ Theory of Well-Being and PERMA™ Workshops
PERMA™ Theory of Well-Being and PERMA™ Workshops

Unearth the essence of the PERMA™ Theory of Well-Being and the transformative potential of PERMA™ Workshops. Delve into the science of happiness, exploring how these innovative strategies can enhance personal and professional life, fostering resilience, positivity, and lasting fulfillment.

PERMA™ Theory of Well-Being

Positive Psychology is the scientific study of the factors that enable individuals and communities to flourish.

  • There are five building blocks that enable flourishing: Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment
  • Different people will derive well-being from each of these building blocks to varying degrees

Implications for institutional and public policy applications

Schools can educate students for flourishing as well as for workplace success

  • Workplaces can improve performance and raise employee well-being
  • Therapists can nurture their patients’ strengths to prevent mental illness and enhance flourishing
  • Communities can encourage public service and civic engagement
  • PERMA™ Workshops
  • Assessing the well being of individuals with psychological disorders could lead to government and business policies that yield benefits to the individual, the organization, and the nation

Benefits of Well-Being

Relationships: The experiences that contribute to well-being are often amplified through our relationships, for example, great joy, meaning, laughter, a feeling of belonging, and pride in accomplishment

  • Meaning: A sense of meaning and purpose can be derived from belonging to and serving something bigger than the self
  • Accomplishment: People pursue achievement, competence, success, and mastery for its own sake, in a variety of domains, including the workplace, sports, games, hobbies, etc. People pursue accomplishment even when it does not necessarily lead to positive emotion or relationships

References

Alarcon et al., 2013

  • Diener & Seligman, 2004
  • Brand & Steptoe, 2009
  • Chemers, Hu, Garcia, 2001
  • Seligmann & Schulman, 1986
  • Helgeson & Fritz, 1999
  • Kubzansky, Sparrow, Vokonas & Kawachi, 2001
  • Danner, Snowdon, & Friesen 2001
  • Dillon, Minchoff, & Baker 1985
  • Fredrickson & Joiner 2002
  • Fry & Debats, 2009

Source