India's External Affairs Minister, EAM Jaishankar, outlines the severe impact of ongoing global conflicts on international stability and economies. He highlights how disruptions in grain and fertilizer supplies, exacerbated by events like the 'super El Nino,' are pushing the world toward a major food crisis.
Jaishankar also points to the devastating effects on Global South economies, which face crises in energy, food, and finance due to these conflicts. These insights are drawn from EAM Jaishankar's interview with India Today.
-
Impending global food crisis. A significant food crisis is anticipated in the coming months, driven by multiple factors. Major grain exporters, particularly from the Black Sea region, face disruptions in their shipments. Concurrently, there are substantial shortages of fertilizers, with key producers located in the Middle East and Russia. These issues are compounded by the emergence of a 'super El Nino' event, which is expected to further strain agricultural production.
-
Global conflicts' devastating impact on Global South. The conflicts in Ukraine and the Iran-Gulf region have had a devastating and multi-faceted impact on Global South economies. These regions are experiencing severe crises in energy, food, and fertilizer supplies. Additionally, financial flows are being disrupted, as capital tends to move towards perceived safe havens during conflicts, away from the Global South.
-
Two countervailing forces in global stability. Global stability is currently shaped by two significant countervailing forces. First, conflicts such as those in Ukraine and Iran create ripple effects that disrupt global energy and grain markets. Second, the extraterritorial application of sanctions by major powers compels third countries to align themselves, often against their own interests, thereby complicating international relations and fostering a less rational multipolar world.
-
Self-interest in preventing Global South distress. Neglecting the fundamental needs of countries in the Global South can result in a breakdown of governance and widespread global insecurity. Therefore, it is in the self-interest of other nations to actively work towards preventing such distress. This approach helps avert issues like SDG regression, energy crises, political instability, and the broader threats of terrorism, crime, migration, and infectious diseases that can arise from neglected regions.
-
Policymaker responsibility for global consequences. Policymakers bear a responsibility to understand and account for the global consequences of their decisions, even if those consequences are unintended. They cannot claim a lack of intent for negative outcomes. A self-centered approach that disregards the impact on other nations is irresponsible, as the 'cost of magical thinking' ultimately affects global stability.
-
Agile diplomacy in a disordered world. In an increasingly less orderly and globalized world, governments are finding strategies like hedging, triaging, and 'bamboo diplomacy' to be more essential. 'Bamboo diplomacy,' a term used by Thai and other Southeast Asian nations, refers to being agile and opportunistic in international relations. While these attributes are not new, their demand has intensified as countries navigate complex and unpredictable global dynamics.
-
Competitive and unpredictable global dynamics. The global landscape is evolving into a more competitive and unpredictable environment. This shift necessitates that countries actively seek stable and reliable partners while also diversifying their alliances. A new dynamic, culture, and approach to negotiations and bargains are emerging, driven by the inherent self-interest of nations to stabilize their own lives.
-
Complexity of US-India trade relations. The relationship between the US and India has encountered difficulties, mirroring challenges the US faces with many other nations. Trade negotiations, in particular, are complicated by India's unique societal structure, which includes a large number of small producers. This factor, along with the per capita gap and the nature of production, adds layers of complexity to reaching trade agreements.