What does value mean to Indian makeup buyers? | The Indian Cosmetics Market Research report

Saving money accounts for 31.8% of explicitly stated makeup needs in Relvo’s research. Long wear and coverage also appear; price alone is incomplete.

ON THIS PAGE

  • Saving money accounts for 31.8% of decision events with an explicitly stated makeup need.
  • Long wear with less touch-up accounts for 25.9%, and coverage for 21.2%.
  • These shares concern stated needs in the evidence; they are not the buying priorities of all Indian consumers.

Saving money is the most common explicitly stated need in Relvo’s India cosmetics research, accounting for 31.8% of decision events with a stated need (n=255), snapshot dated 3 October 2026. Long wear with less touch-up accounts for 25.9%, and covering concerns for 21.2%. The evidence describes several tasks that buyers want makeup to perform.

How to read the numbers: Shares describe selected buying decisions or opinions, with the base shown. Positive-opinion charts include positive and negative opinions only. Separate evidence sets may share underlying accounts and differ in buyer and product mix. Small bases are indicative; bases below 10 are reported directionally.

What buyers explicitly want makeup to do. Save money: 31.8%; Long wear with less touch-up: 25.9%; Cover concerns: 21.2%; All remaining stated needs: 21.2%. Base: decision events with a stated need (n=255); rounding applies. Source: Relvo research, snapshot 3 October 2026.
Share of decision events with a stated need. Base: decision events with a stated need (n=255); rounding applies. Source: Relvo research, snapshot 3 October 2026. Selected buyer discussion and recent reviews; sources and product sets differ. Not purchase data and not a representative survey.

That makes value a question about the intended result as well as the price. A buyer looking to save money is asking something different from a buyer who wants fewer touch-ups. Both may compare prices, but the research does not establish how they trade cost against performance.

The India cosmetics market research codes a need only where it is stated. Most recorded decisions do not contain one, so the visible mix cannot be applied to all buyers. It would be misleading to infer a budget motive simply because the product discussed has a low price.

For brands, the useful investigation is the reference the buyer uses. What would they otherwise choose? Which result do they want from this purchase? Was the product proposed because it costs less or because it performs a particular task? The account needs to supply that reason before the brand assigns a motive.

Relvo’s consumer behavior evidence helps frame those questions. It does not estimate willingness to pay, establish an ideal price or show that discounting would increase purchases. A pricing test would need a defined comparison and direct evidence of the decision.

Questions about the research

Does 31.8% mean that share of all makeup buyers prioritise low prices? No. It is the share of recorded decision events with an explicitly stated need that concern saving money. Most recorded decisions do not state a need.

Is this based on sales data? No. It uses coded buyer accounts and opinions. It is not purchase data and not a representative survey.

Related research: The India Cosmetics Market Report, 2026 on NBW Brain examines buyer decisions, product experiences and behavioural patterns, with evidence available through its Market Brain.

Methodology

Source: Relvo cosmetics research, snapshot dated 3 October 2026. Selected India-focused makeup discussions and recent product reviews cover October 2025–October 2026. Records were checked for category and geography, coded to a fixed codebook and reviewed for coding reliability. The discussion evidence is heavily English-language and concentrated in a few sources. Reviews cover selected products and recent experiences; they are not a random sample of purchases. Positive-opinion shares exclude mixed and neutral opinions. Each percentage refers to the event or opinion set named alongside it. Evidence layers may share accounts and are not independent samples. Bases of 10–29 are indicative; bases below 10 are reported directionally. Findings are self-reported, not sales data or a representative survey.

Make sense of what's next.

A clear-eyed digest of AI, products, and ideas worth understanding. Join the NextBigWhat newsletter.

more AI news

Google launches synth-id to identify AI-generated content

Google has introduced a standalone platform called SynthID Detector, designed to help users determine if online content was generated using Google AI or its partner tools. This initiative aims to enhance transparency and trust in digital content, amidst growing concerns about the authenticity of AI-generated materials. The tool reflects Google’s commitment to ethical AI usage and the accountability of content creators.

US halts green card access for major IT firms amid H-1B abuse claims

The US Department of Labor has suspended major tech companies, including Microsoft, Infosys, and Cognizant, from the green card program due to allegations of H-1B visa abuse. This decision impacts several prominent IT firms such as TCS, Wipro, and Capgemini, potentially affecting their ability to recruit foreign talent. The move underscores increasing scrutiny on visa practices within the tech industry.

Amazon cuts ties with Meta’s Muse AI over transparency issues

Amazon has terminated its partnership with Meta’s Muse AI shopping agent, citing concerns over the agent’s credentials and transparency. This decision reflects Amazon’s commitment to safeguarding its customer journey and maintaining control over its retail ecosystem. The move highlights the ongoing scrutiny of AI tools in e-commerce and their impact on customer trust.